• ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Is it the “can’t not pay for social services” restriction?

    You mean unnecessary use of resources tax.

    The “can’t secretly own a firearm” resteiction?

    Secret? The firearms bans are only affecting people apart of the Canadian Firearms Program, people who have gone through the CFSC and daily background checks.

    You think criminals are actually going to follow the law and abide by these bans? It’s literal abuse of OIC just to take law abiding citizens property.

    the “can’t overrule other countries’ entry requirements” restriction?

    I assume you’re referring to the B.C women who was recently arrested over at the US border. Ultimately she went down there with incomplete documentation, like everyone else she should’ve sorted that out before even attempting to cross.

    • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can literally see a direct link between difficulty of acquiring a gun legally and difficulty acquiring a gun illegally.

      Statistically, majority of guns used in crime were legally purchased at some point in their existence

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Statistically, majority of guns used in crime were legally purchased at some point in their existence

        That’s really not at all baffling? We’re talking guns over 100 years old ending up on these ban lists.

        The recent public safety announcement they claim that the rifles banned were meant for war. Guns like the GSG (German Sports-Shooting Gun) were banned while not banning the SKS (Made literally for ww2).

        The logic here is admittedly flawed and not enough Canadians realize that.

        • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you have a coherent point to make or was that the attempt?

          Asking as an rpal holder who finds the new round of restrictions poorly written and ill-informed, but that isn’t going to drive me to vote for an idiot like PP.

          • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Asking as an rpal holder who finds the new round of restrictions poorly written and ill-informed, but that isn’t going to drive me to vote for an idiot like PP.

            That’s disappointing to hear. PAL/RPAL holders are a dying breed among Canadians and the liberals intend to solidify it.

            • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              So… no coherent point. Thank you for clarifying.

              Anyone can earn my vote by:

              Prioritizing healthcare and social services (including education) Protecting basic human rights. Not being a shit-bag of a human nor tolerating them in government. Focusing on green economic growth.

              I don’t base my votes off who can get me the most irrationally mad about issues that are invented or overblown. And while I have a whole list of complaints about the uselessness of the changes to gun laws here, the biggest one is how effective it is at mobilizing otherwise happily dissconnected voters into actually taking the time to go vote. It’s like 8d chess where the Liberals are looking for a way to get the Conservative vote out and found the key…