• remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I didn’t suggest anything about his character, and we could probably have an entirely separate discussion about imperialism.

    What is important is how you source information when it comes to dental prosthetics.

    • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Oh please, criticizing the meme because “the teeth were bought” Is an attempt to save his caharacter. And then saying that images with words are all dumb. People can see through your attempt of white washing.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I don’t give a fuck about his character.

        You are making assumptions about my intent or what I believe, which is a childish argument tactic.

        Again, internet pictures with words are fucking dumb. You might get a ton of likes on Facebook with that shit though.

        • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Go on a seethe, cope calling me childish or whatever your manipulation tactic is, but your attempt of white washing is obvious. I am done talking to you.

          • hime0321@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            I only see one person coping and seething. Dude has criticism about a meme because the source is questionable and you just bitch and moan. You literally put word in their mouth.

            • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              Lmao, “questionable source”, you can literally Google that in 5 seconds and see all the sources that confirm that. Now I know that memes are supposed to have sources when the users can easily Google it themselves /s. The white washing apologist just get funnier and funnier.

              • hime0321@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                “Just Google it” is not a source. I would really like to know why you think I’m white washing. I’m arguing about you being an absolute jack ass. You are being childish, that is a fact. The source is your comments. Idc if you don’t source facts on a meme. In fact I “just googled it” for the Lincoln one and once I have more time I’ll probably dig in further. I still find it funny that some child is calling me a white washing apologist as if you know me.

                • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  If you disagree post a source that disproves, instead of defending someone that is trying to defend Washington’s slave teeth because he took advantage of slaves to “buy” their teeth. You are a white washing apologist because you are defending someone who was trying to white wash Washington in the comments. You don’t “need to know someone” to call them out on what they are explicitly doing in a comment section 🤣.

                  If a racist says something racist in a comment section, you sound like the kind of person who would jump in to say “dont call them racist, you don’t know them” lmao.

                  This person was trying to minimize the impact of Washington having teeth from slaves and you jump in to say “they were just arguing a questionable source” and when I say that the info is openly available you responded “Just Google it” is not a source

                  You are literally just a racist apologist who wants to be a contrarian. I am done with arguing with people who try to act smart and pretends that anyone who calls them out in their bs is a child. Because calling people children is so mature /s. What you are doing is called being a patronizing contrarian.