• Don’t choose Germany, though, we (and a lot of nations, actually) still for some reason have citizenship-by-blood/heritage laws more or less straight out of the 19th century, not citizenship-by-birthplace laws.

    • BurnoutDV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      As a German myself I would like to here some arguments why citizen by the place you happen to be at birth is better?

      • Basically: Resident enfranchisement. It’s weird, when people born in our country and having lived here their whole life can’t vote outside of local elections. My own father, for example, had a Dutch background, and was never allowed to vote in federal elections until his death. (Neither he nor I even spoke/speak a single phrase of Dutch)

        Yes, things have gotten somewhat better and easier with applications for citizenship, but that there are hurdles like that to begin with, is a bit… weird.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Americans posting memes against American Imperialism, while simultaneously having an American-Centric worldview about the world in regards to citizenship.

    Ironic.

    (No offense to OP 😉)

    • Genius@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      tbh I had no idea Europe was so racist. Citizenship based on “blood” sounds like something out of the middle ages.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Countries that use Jus Soli usually also have Jus Sanguinis. The USA for example. My friend is a US citizen despite not being born there because his mother is a US citizen.

        Not having Jus Sanguinis would be downright horrible. Imagine your mother moves back to her home country and if you want to follow her you have to clear immigration hurdles.

        • Genius@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yeah having it as well is good. Using only it is inhumane and barbaric.

          • meaansel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            For that matter, aren’t borders kinda inhumane and barbaric in the first place? They declare some people as second-rate. They trap people in poor dictatorships, but are oh so permeable for conflict minerals or products of sweatshops

            Could your point be that generally more ways to become citizen is a better than less?