• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The third party. And if the Democrats and Republicans ever want to be viable again, they’ll have to join with each other or with the 3rd party, depending on which is closer ideologically. So we’re back to 2 parties.

    And by the way, support for any 3rd parties in the US is currently at less than 5%, nowhere close to the >50‰ required to make this scenario plausible. It has happened before, though not in the last 150 years, usually with the total collapse of one of the two parties. Andrew Jackson personally caused the collapse of the existing parties by basically turning them into pro-Jackson and anti-Jackson parties. And then a few decades later the anti-Jackson party itself completely split over the question of slavery, and then the Civil War created the two parties we have today, Democrats and Republicans. The two parties almost completely swapped supporters and positions in the 1960s due to Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, but the two ideological groups of voters have been the same since the mid-1800s even though they’ve changed names.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The third party.

      Then it’s not mathematically impossible that a third party wins you are making up bullshit. In europe brand new parties win elections all the time

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Maybe if you read more than literally the first 3 fucking words of my post, you’d realize how utterly stupid you’re sounding right now.