I share your optimism. I’d love to see Ecosia + Qwant (or whoever, really) succeed.

That’s a fair point, “misleading” might’ve been a poor choice of words, but - one of the points on their page reads

“Our solar panels produce enough energy to power your searches twice over, meaning more renewables (and fewer fossil fuels) in the energy grid.”

So fair enough, they’re offsetting enough to power the connection from their users to Google/MS; I just thought this quote (and their home page in general) glossed over their reliance on those 3rd parties to “do the dirty work”, so to speak.

Hey, that’s cool! I hope they can keep up the environmental message as they wean off Google/MS. Have they given a timeframe on when they hope to implement it? Seems like a huge task.

Question for the Ecosia fans in the audience - The “we plant trees with ad revenue” is pretty cool, but they’re just a front end for Google (or Bing), yeah?

If so, isn’t their whole “we’re green” thing misleading? Does it really support EU interests if the backend is still US?