Yep. It says she lacks critical leadership qualities.

You can, as long as the hosting server welcomes your interaction. They also have the freedom to NOT allow you (Or anyone else) submit content.

I am wondering if the mods of news@lemmy.world and politics@lemmy.world regret censoring the people who rightfully said these things

Probably still thinking “This is just a Russian disinfo campaign to smeer the libs!”

I’m betting Mark Cuban. They (I believe, based on the sudden interest in him as a “Progressive billionaire” on various social media platforms, and in person talks) that the solution to a Reich Wing Oligarch is a different Reich Wing Oligarch, but Blue this time.

Nah, I think we should run Biden one more time. Surely, it’ll be different this time! /s

In my state, there are two ballot lines. One for POTUS, and one for VP.

Yes. As much as the Dems insist “This is a critical juncture, and we need to unite”, they mean “You need to unite behind whatever we say you need to do”.

See post-election: The only thing the Dems want to do is wear matching outfits, rather than vote “No”.

How are laws stating “If you’ve beaten your spouse, you cannot own guns” geared towards conservatives? Or, is that a slip of some sort?

No, it does not say any disagreement with Trump

It literally does. That’s how it defines “Trump Derangement Syndrome”.

But yes, Walz will veto it, thankfully.

Assuming it passed, that’s what the bill said. Any disagreement with Trump is a clear sign of a mental disorder.

So, the only possible sane position is to support everything Trump does?

Im hearing what you are saying… The problem is what you are saying logically contradicts itself.

So, they make nothing, and really serve no purpose but to insulate grifters from risk?

You’re not making a good case here…

Smart contracts are designed, programmed and, if they’re done right, rigorously audited for correctness.

What do these “smart contracts” make? And why do we need to burn up tons of fossil fuels, just to have contracts like we had before?

And how is this better than a typical contract?

https://www.zdnet.com/article/hackers-hijack-smart-contracts-in-new-cryptocurrency-token-rug-pull-scams/

Bitcoin was relatively simple, Ethereum is not.

Both are simple ponzi schemes.

They’ve spent years crafting these systems to function for PoS, L2 support, sharding, rollups, etc., at scale.

And all that time, they are still ponzi schemes that do none of the above very well. We’ve had all of that in the merchant payment systems for decades now, all without the need to consume more electricity than many small nations, just to approve a transaction.

“Work”

There is no utility really, for ponzicoins. You can’t make anything from it. You can use it to make anything. You can’t eat it. You can’t hydrate with it. And you can’t use the notes to summon military aid.

I suppose you can buy drugs with it. Maybe.

So yes, it’s a Greatest Fool game.

Now’s a time to buy.

Never is it a good time to invest in a ponzi scheme. It’s just a matter of playing “Greatest Fool”.