I’ll admit, when I first started torrent I was not really familiar with how it worked and how important seeding was. I would just use magnet links without configuration to save the torrent and seed after completion. Well… I have finally, got myself back to 1.00 after a couple months and working to try to always seed double what I get for each torrent.

Often times I was one of the few random seeders available for some of these torrents. Friendly reminder to give back because you never know when you’re one of the rare cases that can complete someones long lost file download!

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    I miss eMule though. I always loved to share some rare exotic stuff and see someone decided they want that and I provided it. It’s not just about bandwidth, though I had pretty big numbers there. Torrents just don’t hit the same.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Soulseek is still kicking ass and taking names, bruh

      If you’re on linux check out the Nicotine+ native linux client for soulseek

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I know, but I still miss my donkey. It was slow but stubborn and always delivered eventually. Also it was mesmerizing watching all the clients and traffic happening and watching KAD nodes visualization. Good times. It’s still there but because it now always connects with LowID it doesn’t work as good as it did with HighID…

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Soulseek has no torrents and no swarms. It’s a classic, direct peer-to-peer connection between you and another user. You have to choose to share items in your library, like in the old days. Most file sharing like this was shut down two decades ago now since bittorrent was alive and kicking in 2001 and became the dominant way to share files. However, Soulseek has somehow flown under the radar and kept chugging along. It’s my premier place to find obscure music I can’t find anywhere else.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Problem is how most networks are configured today that prevent HighID on eMule, severely crippling it. It used to be annoying to have LowID in the past and reconnecting usually fixes it, now it’s a given and you can’t get out of it. It’s so hard to get uploads going and it makes me sad :(

        • supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          The problem with HighID/LowID on eMule is the same on bittorrent or any other p2p, you need someone with port forwarding to upload/download content. In my case I am out of cg-nat and sharing 24/7.

          • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s not. Bittorrent uses newer methods to connect that work with current network configurations where eMule devs stubbornly refused because it would create some overhead like we’re still stuck on 56k or ISDN era and never improved it.

            Apparently there is a way using VPN with P2P, but I’m not gonna pay for it just to run eMule…

            • supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Nope, it is the same. Bittorrent have a lot more users than eMule and then you have more possibilities to find a peer with ports forwarded. 2 peers Without port forwarded can not share content.

              • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I have ports forwarded locally to deal with my router, that doesn’t apply to my ISP down the line. And that’s the problem. I don’t know the specifics, but that’s how it was explained to me.

                • MEtrINeS@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I have ports forwarded locally to deal with my router, that doesn’t apply to my ISP down the line.

                  So you are under CGNAT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT

                  From the wikipedia link:

                  Carrier-grade NAT usually prevents the ISP customers from using port forwarding, because the network address translation (NAT) is usually implemented by mapping ports of the NAT devices in the network to other ports in the external interface. This is done so the router will be able to map the responses to the correct device; in carrier-grade NAT networks, even though the router at the consumer end might be configured for port forwarding, the “master router” of the ISP, which runs the CGN, will block this port forwarding because the actual port would not be the port configured by the consumer.[7] In order to overcome the former disadvantage, the Port Control Protocol (PCP) has been standardized in the RFC 6887.

                  You will only be able to upload to someone with a public ip address or with UDP hole punch (but there are some technicalities - and doesn’t work in all the cases). The same will happen if you use torrents. Maybe you don’t notice difference because of the sheer amount of people using seedboxes and vpn.