• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      The cookie law isn’t dumb, but at this point it should maybe be reformed. Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required. Instead of complaining about the cookie banner law, people should complain about websites who sell their users’ data.

      • denshi@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required.

        That is actually the status quo. If a website only uses cookies that are needed to make the website function, there is no need for a banner or dialogue. These cookie banners are there deliberately to be annoying so you’ll agree to more than is necessary.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The dumb bit of the law is the fact that websites are allowed to put up an annoying banner that says either accept cookies or individually deselect 240 checkboxes.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The newest take on cookies, is “accept all, or pay to read”. Quite shady, if you ask me.