• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any “evil” suffered in current life will be compensated with reward in afterlife.

    The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That doesn’t work. People with crap lives often can’t meet the standards of goodness that many forms of Christianity need for you to be qualified for heaven

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If there is no evil how can there be good?

        If the purpose of life is to be a test, how can you test without challenges (evil)?

        The crux of the problem is once again the modernized version of Christianity. Where hell has been written out and Adolf Hitler goes to heaven because “Jesus died for his sins”.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If there is no evil how can there be good?

          Easy. You take the world as it is right now…and then remove the evil things. Evil is a metaphysical concept. We often use analogies of light and dark, but it doesn’t literally work that way.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              First, you’ll note that I started this conversation by conceding free will and concentrating my discussion of evil on evils that are not performed by humans, but by the planet itself, or by fundamental biology.

              But as for “the concept of life as a test”…why is something supposedly omniscient performing a test? It should already know the result of said test, thus making the test itself irrelevant. That’s what omniscience is.

              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Evil existing is necessary for a test in good and evil. Whether done by humans or natural causes.

                Angels were created as perfect servants who obey all commands without free will. Humans were created as the opposite. Those who have free will to perform both good and evil.

                It should already know the result of said test, thus making the test itself irrelevant. That’s what omniscience is.

                An all-powerful entity is not bound by paradoxes. If that was the case it would end at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox which is even more extreme than the free-will paradox for which some explanations can be thought of.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

      Huh? From what I can tell Christians are more fixated on hell than ever now. Listen to them talk about gay/trans people, Palestinians, women who get abortions, or literally anyone who isn’t Christian, and it’s clear that they’re really excited about the idea that their god will torture those people for all eternity while they get to watch from heaven. You’ll even get catholics and protestants both thinking they’re the only ones going to heaven and the “wrong” kind of Christian goes to hell because of technicalities like whether you go to confession or not or whether praying to Mary is idolatry. Some outright say that it’s okay to kill gay/trans people, Palestinians, etc, because they’re damned anyway and god doesn’t give a shit about them.