• cheprofumo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Im still not sure if this is true, but I’ve seen a couple people post that OnlyOffice may be Russian owned with a location in Latvia just to avoid association. I really hope not because I do like the UI more. I tried asking Le Chat about it and got this. I’d love to get someone else’s take on this though.

      OnlyOffice is owned by Ascensio System SIA, a Latvian-based IT company with headquarters in Riga. The company was founded by Lev Bannov, who is also the CEO of OnlyOffice. The ownership structure has undergone significant changes, with the Singapore holding company ONLYOFFICE Capital Group Pte. Ltd. now being the ultimate owner of Ascensio System SIA through its UK subsidiary, Ascensio System Limited .

      OnlyOffice has faced allegations and concerns regarding its ties to Russia. Some sources claim that OnlyOffice is a Russian company that has attempted to mask its origins by using a Latvian company as a front. These allegations suggest that the company has connections to the Russian government and military, and that it has set up shell companies to avoid being associated with Russia following the Russian invasion of Ukraine .

      The company has been accused of using its Latvian headquarters as a way to enter the international market while continuing to operate and develop its products in Russia under the name R7 Office . These concerns have led some companies to sever ties with OnlyOffice due to its alleged support for the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its failure to condemn the conflict .

      Despite these claims, it is important to note that OnlyOffice is officially headquartered in Riga, Latvia, and operates under Ascensio System SIA. The company has a complex ownership structure, with a Singapore holding company owning the UK branch, which in turn owns the Latvian branch .

      source 1 source 2 source 3

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m not a fan of people applying nationalism to open source software. I get this is a reaction to another country’s nationalism but it really undermines what open source software is all about.

    Yea, The Document Foundation is based in Germany. But Libre Office is an international collaborative open source project, with contributors in many countries.

    Open source projects dont have a nationality. Even the ones with organisations based in the USA. And if people really are concerned about US based legal orgs then we should be looking at forking the software.

    Its already under open source licences and belongs to everyone regardless of nationality.

    • gon [he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ll say, I feel this. I love FOSS, and I love the BuyEuropean movement as well, but I’m also always scared this will turn nationalistic, which I’m not a big fan of…

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Precisely my feelings. I hope it doesn’t turn out to in the negative way, but I’m afraid of some of the vitriol I’m seeing already

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Uuuh this is about closed source Microsoft Office Vs open source Libre Office which just happen to be from Germany and thus is the reason why this is posted in this community.

  • aldfin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Libreoffice is amazing. I had dismissed it ages ago back when I had no reason to boycott the US, but now I tried it again after switching to Linux and it works amazingly good.

    There’s no need for MS Office for personal use, though unfortunately for my large corporate employer it probably isn’t going to realistically be considered.

    • d_k_bo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      LibreOffice is a fork of OpenOffice and most developers went to work on LibreOffice instead. You should consider switching to LibreOffice.

      • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Nope! I do believe it’s OpenOffice, an older version, idk I downloaded a popular FOSS version a few years back. Pretty insane that Microsoft actually thinks people should pay a subscription to rent this stuff, lol

    • altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      To ensure better compatibility, do a fresh save-as to another format if possible on MS side (docx-doc, doc-docx, -docm, whatever). It forces Office to rebuild the file, i believe, and usually it fixes some display mistakes coming from excessive formatting, trashes the leftovers of previous edits, etc, and the file itself becomes lighter. Some other tricks:

      1. Have strict formatting rules and only select amount of styles. If you see them mutating, choose to select everything with a style-bastard applied, and then reapply their parent to all affected paragraphs (after what it should disappear);
      2. Don’t use rare fonts as long as possible, and if you do, on different machines too, copy them from Windows fonts folder in advance;
      3. Overwhelmingly long and complex tables in Word usually break. The most dire offender is how you unite cells and move separate cells’ borders, because it breaks their structure. Google has workarounds iand limitations on that in their products. To ensure your table translates right, copy it into Excel and then back after setting all cells in Excel to text data, as it likes to reformat e.g. 18.03.2025 into date format and such.

      Some of these problems occured to me between different installations of MS products themselves, and with LO I had it the other way: Excel had a bugged file that wasn’t adjustable in how to print it. One column wasn’t fitting on the page one, but once I move the guideline over that column, Excel cuts this table into 70+ pages, one cell on each. The only thing that helped is opening this exact file in LO Calc where this problem just can’t be reproduced. Since that I use Calc first, and then Google Sheets as I haven’t found a fitting online sharing solution for myself and get invited tonedit it by others, and Excel is not an option at all anymore.

    • JTPorkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same. I’ve had some professional frustrations when spreadsheets don’t carry over formatting correctly and dealing with macros is a pain, but it’s great to start with or if you aren’t collaborating.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    LO is good software.

    It replaced MSOffice Word for me (and I had been using Word since the early 90s). It also has a few extensions one may want to consider adding. Stuff like extra dictionaries for example, or better (than the default provided) ePub/HTML export tools.

    https://extensions.libreoffice.org/