I thought I could take this down after the election, apparently not.
Please review the sidebar.
- No self posts.
- No meme/image/shitposting.
- No video links.
- No social media. This includes Substack and Medium blogposts.
- Doxing people, even Nazis, gets you banned.
Those posts are better directed to Political Discussion or Political Memes.
!politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Articles from trusted sources are absolutely welcome.
Items 1-4 can be used in comments, they just can’t be submitted as posts.
The usual lemmy.world rules apply too:
No calls for violence. Full stop.
We’re seeing an uptick in trolling already, trolls will be banhammered without warning.
Why is this site called “politics”, but you can only talk about politics in the USA?
Because it was created as a place for US politics. !world@lemmy.world was created as the US free zone.
Combining the two creates a US dominated space where world events get buried under US news and politics.
Oh, really? :D That’s funny, since lemmy.world seems to be full of US-related stuff. Oh well. Thanks for the info, and have a nice day!
Lemmy.World is the instance.
!world@lemmy.world is the US free community.
Rename this US Politics please. Nothing daily posted about my Australian politics. Also the logo is American.
!world@lemmy.world is for non-US News and Politics.
politics@lemmy.us should be about US politics… America isn’t the world.
!world@lemmy.world is intentionally set up as a US free zone to distinguish it from !news@lemmy.world and !politics@lemmy.world
Yeah, it sucks though that for 95.5% of “the world” we don’t even have distinct politics or news subs in an instance called lemmy.world. I’d really like to find a place where I can read about the politics or news of the actual whole world (including the US) and ironically none of these are that.
The problem is, that the minute you include US politics in the feed, it becomes all Trump/Musk top to bottom and there’s no room for anything else to breathe. :(
My pet interest is Myanmar since my daughter in law is from there, but even that gets drowned out in !world@lemmy.world due to Ukraine and Gaza.
So, op-eds from main stream media are allowed, but journalists publishing their work through substack is not allowed. So, only the establishment is allowed to have their voices heard. Got it. Quite the hill to die on @jordanlund
We don’t care who is publishing on Substack. The platform as a whole is not a news source.
That’s increasingly a not very nuanced or serious stance to hold given that actual journalists and columnists do publish on substack, especially those that are trying to break away from billionaire controlled “news sources” with owners that are actually interfering in editorial and reporting decisions. Do you remove all op-eds from your “news sources”? If not, you’re saying billionaire-controlled “news sources” are legitimate, but not independent journalists and columnists with actual bona fides, including having been part of establishment media or worked in government previously. The internet has destroyed journalism, seems wrong to tune out those who are trying to put it together again.
I’m not going to make a call for violence, but I want to point out the hypocrisy here. The rich have chosen violence every day of our and their lives, yet we plebes have to be civil about it? Taking the high road hasn’t done us any favors, and it’s about time we learn from that lesson.
