All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, unless otherwise noted.

  • 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t think I’d be willing to comply with the law and watch them as a doctor, and I hope most doctors would agree, because I’d personally far prefer to get treatment than follow the laws in an emergency.

    Well I can totally agree with this, life is greater than law. I would assume Good Samaritan laws would protect anyone practicing medicine without a license in that case.

    But if someone is constantly doing a procedure where death is not imminent, then that’s something different, and it should only be done by license personnel.

    There’s two different scenarios described (risk of immediate death, vs not), and what I’ve seen done usually by people who support protesting by regularly doing the procedure, is that they mix those two scenarios together, in essence creating a legal loophole.

    Save lives, definitely do it. Just protesting, you better be licensed.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0


  • Fair enough, but if she’s not surprised, and knows it’s illegal, I’m not sure what else to say, except for, if you’re going to protest you might get arrested for the protest, especially if that protest is practicing medicine without a license for the procedure.

    You want to protest a law do it another way. Transport the people to another state where they can have it done legally, if it’s feasible to do so healthwise. And yes I’m aware there’s probably a law against transporting them, but it’s a lot less risky protest than practicing medicine on someone without a license to do it.

    Otherwise campaign to have elected officials that won’t pass laws like that.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0






  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldBluesky does federation-washing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    From the article …

    This effectively means that, if you get banned by the Bluesky company, you’re out. Sure, you could still host your own Personal Data Server, wait for a non-existent independent Relay to fetch your data and interact with users of third-party Bluesky applications. But you won’t: you’re effectively at the mercy of the Bluesky company.

    Point two, and more importantly: this approach provides an “exit strategy” in the event that Bluesky “goes evil”. Right now, that’s false: parts of the social network are still centralized and it’s impossible to avoid that. But even if we limit ourselves to PDSs and Relay, the current situation is that federation is only achievable in theory and no one has done it in practice yet.