A midwife in Texas could face up to 20 years in prison for providing reproductive health care in the state, which has one of the nation’s strictest abortion bans. The arrest of Maria Margarita Rojas marks the first criminal case against an alleged abortion provider in Texas since the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022 — and a major escalation in the far right’s war against bodily autonomy.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on Monday that Rojas, 48, had been arrested on charges of providing illegal abortions and practicing medicine without a license. One of her employees, Jose Ley, was also arrested for providing an abortion and practicing without a license. Providing an abortion in Texas is punishable by up to life in prison and up to $100,000 in civil fines.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    practicing medicine without a license.

    Hot take, but anyone should be arrested for this, regardless of what procedure they were doing.

    (Assuming the states ‘Good Samaritan’ laws doesn’t protect them from practicing otherwise.)

    Edit: Everybody is forgetting that back alley abortions used to be a horrible thing, stopped for a reason. Find other ways to protest, keep people safe.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Do you make all your moral choices based on the written law of Texas?

        No, but I do make them based on the written law of wherever I’m at.

        And as I’ve mentioned already (further down), morally, life is greater than law.

        But you can’t open the floodgates to anybody practicing surgery on others for protest reasons. We were there before, with back alley abortions, many that went bad. The laws are there for a reason. (Politicians abusing laws is a different matter.)

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Bread_and_Circuses@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hot take, but the GOP has been using the technicality of shitty laws they pass to give cover for your hot take.

      Parsing up the fine details of this completely avoidable, ridiculously stupid action taken by Texas officials is important to having an honest conversation

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Hot take, but the GOP has been using the technicality of shitty laws they pass to give cover for your hot take.

        Vote them out. And if you can’t, then deal with it (protest verbally, etc.), or move to another place without those lawmakers.

        Parsing up the fine details of this completely avoidable, ridiculously stupid action taken by Texas officials is important to having an honest conversation

        I have no problem talking about it. Seeing back alley abortions be a thing again, not so much.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Normally I’d agree

      Rojas, known as “Dr. Maria,” is a nurse practitioner who has been a licensed midwife in the US since 2018; she previously worked as an obstetrician in Peru. She owns and, before her arrest, operated four health care clinics in the Houston area called Clínicas Latinoamericanas, which predominantly serve low-income Spanish-speaking patients.

      Given that in other states, nps are qualified to provide abortions (and they can apparently own medical clinics in this one), this seems more like an issue caused by the laws in Texas than helped by them.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        this seems more like an issue caused by the laws in Texas than helped by them.

        If midwives are “licensed” to do that procedure, then they shouldn’t be using that as an excuse for their arrest. Would just depend how the laws are written, really.

        Bottom line though, if you’re not legally cleared to do the procedure, then you should be arrested if you do the procedure.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The procedure is banned, nobody’s licensed to do it anymore. If you’ve trained as an obstetrician and midwife and can do a lifesaving procedure which has now been banned because politicians got worried that not enough people show up to church, I think it’s absolutely your right to get upset for being arrested for it. The other option is for someone who took the Hippocratic oath to sit and watch people needlessly die for politics.

          I don’t think she’s surprised, because it’s not surprising, but it’s sure as hell upsetting.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Fair enough, but if she’s not surprised, and knows it’s illegal, I’m not sure what else to say, except for, if you’re going to protest you might get arrested for the protest, especially if that protest is practicing medicine without a license for the procedure.

            You want to protest a law do it another way. Transport the people to another state where they can have it done legally, if it’s feasible to do so healthwise. And yes I’m aware there’s probably a law against transporting them, but it’s a lot less risky protest than practicing medicine on someone without a license to do it.

            Otherwise campaign to have elected officials that won’t pass laws like that.

            This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That depends. She’s a trained obstetrician, she probably knows when moving the patient is better than not (and yes, anyone can sue you for $10k for helping someone over state lines for the purpose of getting an abortion). There’s also the possibility that it’s a ten or more hour drive to the nearest clinic, which comes with a significant time and gas money commitment that some people would find it difficult to impossible to make. I agree that performing medicine is not the most effective protest, but it’s totally the most effective way of making sure that your vulnerable patients get medical care.

              Campaigning against abortion bans is great, but how many women will die before the next election? I don’t think I’d be willing to comply with the law and watch them as a doctor, and I hope most doctors would agree, because I’d personally far prefer to get treatment than follow the laws in an emergency.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                I don’t think I’d be willing to comply with the law and watch them as a doctor, and I hope most doctors would agree, because I’d personally far prefer to get treatment than follow the laws in an emergency.

                Well I can totally agree with this, life is greater than law. I would assume Good Samaritan laws would protect anyone practicing medicine without a license in that case.

                But if someone is constantly doing a procedure where death is not imminent, then that’s something different, and it should only be done by license personnel.

                There’s two different scenarios described (risk of immediate death, vs not), and what I’ve seen done usually by people who support protesting by regularly doing the procedure, is that they mix those two scenarios together, in essence creating a legal loophole.

                Save lives, definitely do it. Just protesting, you better be licensed.

                This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s reasonable, but it’s a red herring. Many states enable midwives to perform abortion care.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s reasonable, but it’s a red herring. Many states enable midwives to perform abortion care.

        Apparently it’s not a red herring in Texas though. Just depends on how the laws are written there, how much a midwife can do or not.

        Bottom line, if you’re not legally cleared to do the procedure, then you should be arrested if you do the procedure.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0