• devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      10000 times better than the previously mainstream way which was people sending you office docs expecting you could open that shit.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, but not just that. Opening a document in Word is for the writer.

        A pet peeve of mine is when I’m sent a user guide as a Word document complete with squiggly lines under the words it doesn’t know.

        Even worse is when a colleague sends a document like that to a customer.

        PDF is a published file format, I find it hard to imagine a world where you could convince me downloading the user manual for my motherboard or downloading Lego assembly instructions should come as a word document.

        I bet this person thinks all raster images should be bitmaps. Sorry maybe that was too harsh.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s good for sending documents you don’t want to be tampered with because most people don’t know how to edit a PDF.

      • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        This. I care about graphic design and aesthetics. So when I send a document to a group for review, I’m not taking the risk of giving them something they could mess with.

    • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Pointless?? Really? We should have just stuck with postscript? I’m pretty happy with pdf for almost anything as there’s a good chance it’ll render how whoever sent it to me was seeing it. What would you suggest/do different?