• arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    Honestly, most new games just fucking suck. They’re too expensive, often don’t run properly at launch even on excellent hardware, and those that don’t have micro-transactions built-in require you to purchase DLC to get the whole game.

    On the other hand, the older titles almost always run well on my machine, have a ton of community DLC, and in general are just designed better because they were built to bring the player as much fun as possible, not to extract as much money as possible.

    Plus, the quality content generated from 2005 - 2015 represents some of the best ever, and can provide hundreds of hours of enjoyment before you even get into the 2010s. Why waste money on something that may not work, and that I likely won’t enjoy as much as the games I bought 10 years ago?

    It’s why I usually wait at least a year after release to consider whether or not I’m going to buy a title.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    I find it kind of funny how games are becoming more mainstream, but every once in a while I still meet people that are like “games are a waste of time”. But then again I guess people said that about movies and tv and still do sometimes.

    Also I’ve been playing guild wars 2 again. Base game is like 10 years old but it’s still fun

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    I’m playing Fallout 4 right now. It’s not the only game I play by any means. Too many new games are overly focused on graphics or monetization. I’m always trying new games and the better ones often don’t have the best graphics. We want 2010 gameplay. Hell, I’ll still play Unreal Tournament 1999 GOTY edition, but older games usually need resolution and texture upgrade mods. Fortunately a lot of great old games actually get them.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    When people found out PhysX doesn’t work on the new Nvidia cards I saw several people here on Lemmy say that it doesn’t matter because almost no one plays older games. I seriously don’t understand how anyone could think that, it’s astoundingly stupid and ignorant.

  • TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    launches Baldur’s Gate.exe ♪♫ “Brave, brave Sir Garrick, Sir Garrick led the way. Brave, brave Sir Garrick, Sir Garrick ran away.” ♪♫

  • Nino477@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There are just so many good games out there. No time to play them all. Also i think epic free games and this prime free game stuff contributed to it. I just started playing bioshock bc of it. Also on pc it feels so good to play an old game and just crank up every setting to max, 4k, install some mods, no ai upscaling but msaa 8x and not having to worry about performance even on mid range PCs. I genuinely prefer the graphics of older games since for me image clarity is much more important than how many polygons a gun has or how the puddle of water reflects light. Like even the new unreal engine 5 games cannot run maxxed out on a 5090 in 4k without upscaling. They only look good in trailers.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      !patientgamers@sh.itjust.works might be of interest, if you don’t follow it.

      But yeah…there are a lot of perks to playing older games:

      • Due to the ubiquity of Internet access today, a lot of games get post-release patches, and ship in a not-entirely-polished state. You wait a few years, you get a game that’s actually finished.

      • There have been wikis, guides, and sometimes mods created.

      • The games that people are still playing are the ones that have stood the test of time, so it’s kinda easy to pick out good ones.

      • If a 3D game supports a higher framerate — and many don’t, due to things like physics running at a fixed frequency — on modern, high-refresh-rate monitors, 3D games can be pleasantly smooth.

      There are some downsides, though:

      • With multiplayer-oriented games, the community can have moved on, rendering the game not very playable.

      • The game may not leverage your hardware very well. You may have an 86 bazillion core processor, and especially older games are likely to be using one of them. I have a couple of games I like, like Oxygen Not Included, that really don’t use multiple cores well…and I’d guess that a similar game released in 2025 likely would.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Due to the ubiquity of Internet access today, a lot of games get post-release patches, and ship in a not-entirely-polished state. You wait a few years, you get a game that’s actually finished.

        And also, 60 EUR for a single game is a price at least I am not willing to pay for the average game, so in addition to getting a better game, I also get a cheaper one.

        There is stuff worth paying that much out there, but it’s not Call of Duty Black Ops Eleventeen

        • Level9831@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          Black ops 6 is so bad IMHO. It takes forever to boot up the game and then hits you with the “update available, quit & restart”. Then waiting another 5 mins to download the update, then another couple mins to reach the main menu again. Oh and what was the actual update? To hit me with an advertisement video of season whatever…with new purchases for dumb costumes etc. Like c’mon just let me play the damn game already! When Im finally in a match the gameplay feels rigged…like I’m playing slots in Vegas than an actual video game. The respawns appearing out of nowhere. I honestly believe what I’m seeing on my screen is not what the other player is seeing. Its like these game designers purposely made this game based on an algorithm rather than setting game rules and allowing the players to compete based on skill. Maybe I’m way off on this (and am just a terrible cod player lol) but would like to hear other people’s opinion on this.

          all the advertisements, constantly wanting me to spend more money when the game was already expensive to begin with. The game play as described as above. Also the perks/tiers suck. Makes for a very unenjoyable experience. The game is just not fun.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    7.1% of the total hours spent were on Counter-Strike: Global Offensive / Counter-Strike 2
    6.4% were in League of Legends
    6.2% were in Roblox
    5.8% were in Dota 2
    5.4% were in Fortnite

    That is a lot of people playing free-to-play competitive multiplayer games.

    • GoumLeChat@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Free is an important reason why. Also, these games run very well on old machines. If you mostly play that and get a new rig, you don’t have to spend a lot. Pc parts have gotten ridiculously expensive.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I get free reducing the barrier-to-entry, but I kinda look at games in terms of “how much is the ratio of the cost to how many hours of fun gameplay that I get?”

        I mean, I have some games that I briefly try, dislike, and never play again. Those are pretty expensive, almost regardless of the purchase price.

        But the thing is, if it’s a game that you play a lot, the purchase price becomes almost irrelevant in cost-per-hour of gameplay. I’ve played Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead — well, okay, you can download that for free, but I also bought it on Steam to throw the developers some money — and Caves of Qud a ton. The price on them is basically a rounding error. And the same is probably true for the top few games in my game library.

        You could charge me probably $2000 for Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead, and it’d still be cheaper per hour of gameplay than nearly all games that I’ve played, because I’ve spent so many hours in the thing.

        If people are playing these like crazy, you’d think that the same would hold for them. That the cost for a game that you play like crazy for many years just…doesn’t matter all that much, because the difference in hours played between games is so huge that it overwhelms the difference in price.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Hmm. That’s a thought. I guess that that’d mesh with them also all being multiplayer.

              • tal@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                It has one of the harshest learning curves out there, but yeah, it’s very replayable and has pretty extensive game mechanics.

                • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  That and Dwarf Fortress; learning curve is steep but they’re rogue-likes. Death is an opportunity to have a whole other adventure and learn from your mistakes and see what RNG has in store for you this time. And there’s infinitely repeatable!

        • tetrachromacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Love seeing another person with lots of hours in Caves of Qud. It’s rapidly climbing up my hours played list since 1.0 release. Bought it at 17.99, played for 220 hours so far. Math says that’s 9 cents an hour, and I’m still not done playing. Live and drink, friend!

        • GoumLeChat@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m old enough to have bought TF2. Played a little less than a thousand hours. Even counting a few in-game purchases, the cost per hour is very low.

          But free means no barrier, you can join anytime,m and stay if you like it. Your friends can try it out too.

          • logan_hero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            3/5 games from that list also launched as paid games, but gained majority of its players after becoming f2p. Yeah people love free stuff ¯_(ツ)_/¯.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Its the replayability. I mean, look how many people are still playing chess. Stick a human intelligence on the other end of the stick and you’ve pretty much got it figured out.

    • kionay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m playing Counter-Strike 2

      … exclusively on a modded server hosting a Warcraft mod

      … that I found because I was searching for the same thing I played on CS:S over a decade ago

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Apparently I’m old.

        Further down in the thread, I ran into someone talking about an older RPG, Realmz. I dug up a subreddit on Reddit related to the game, and the stickied post had this gem:

        https://old.reddit.com/r/Realmz/comments/qoowgl/assorted_realmz_files_codes_realmz_character/

        These are codes that were reissued by Skip (Aka. SpoonLard). He and my grandfather were the original two collaborators when Skip attempted to carbonize Realmz in 2005.

        Nothing like a comment about someone’s grandfather having tried twenty years ago to modernize a game you’ve played in its original form.

    • purrtastic@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Terraria. Every time I fire up the deck to buy a new game, a few days later I am back to Terraria.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I like the game (as well as the similar Starbound) but every time I play it, I wish that it had more ability to create stuff that does things. Like, more Noita-style interactions with the world or Factorio-style automation.

        • C45513@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This 100%. I looooove Noita and any deep systems-driven games where players explore, discover, and create content for years.

          One of my favourite things is the sudden discovery that a game is much bigger and more open-ended than I thought. Especially when it happens dozens of hours in.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s wild how good the cheap games are these days. I’m 30 hours into playing Noita, have hundreds of hours in Vampire Survivor.

    And I got about 15 hours into Dragon Age: Veilguard before it occurred to me I could crack open the Dragon Age Origins Ultimate Edition and actually have an enjoyable experience.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’m 30 hours into playing Noita

      I kind of want more there. There isn’t DLC, and there aren’t clones.

      I mean, yes, the game is large and very replayable, and I have a blast with it…but it’s also kind of the only option for that gameplay.

      I also play it modded with health regeneration, because the difficulty level on the vanilla game is very high, and encourages very cautious play.

  • Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Does “older games” only mean the initial public release? So world of Warcraft, Dota 2, Minecraft… all those games that are constantly updated etc. too?

    Because that would be a really useless statistic. Many games are not a one time release and done thing anymore. They evolve over time. The games I listed have large player bases.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have a large backlog of five(?)+ plus year old games that are really good and I have yet to play. I’d much rather burn through those enjoying them on high settings instead of playing current games on low settings while trying to dodge crap monetization.

  • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh, I’m sorry, I thought I just didn’t like games/am depressed/games are getting BETTER, actually.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Are they getting worse overall or are we just comparing all of the current AAA games to the best AAA of the past few decades? Or comparing the current versions of series to the high points, which might just be the first game in the series?

        We definitely have a number of high quality AAA games that come out each year. Most prior years had a few high quality AAA games and a lot of mediocre or terrible ones too. It’s kind of like music where the average quality over time is actually pretty consistent, but in any given year there are a lot of turds and there are certain trends that are common to those turds.

        90% of every entertainment medium tends to be terrible, but when we look back we mostly remember the 10% that were good and only a few of the absolute worst to laugh at.

        • greenskye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 hours ago

          AAA games are legitimately worse now than before, but the gulf isn’t as big as people are claiming.

          • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            I think they’re both better and worse.

            In the latter half of the 2000s and early 2010s AAA games were becoming increasingly hollowed out husks, with dumbed dumbed down paint-by-numbers gameplay and tons of QTEs. And its not like their narratives or art direction were any good either (it being the blurry brown piss filter era). In the same time period we saw the rise of predatory practices like day one DLCs and preorder bonuses.

            In more recent times I think we’ve actually seen a reversal of the gameplay hollowing out trend, and an improvement in art direction. However with the rise of lootboxes, trading, and gatcha, monetization schemes are more predatory than they’ve ever been (though these are mostly concentrated in multiplayer games). Its also really common now for games to release in an completely broken and unplayable state.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In general, I’d agree that games are getting better, if for no other reason that there are so many made these days that eventually you’ll find something great.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If nothing else, the total volume of great games that are available to play keeps increasing because of massive improvements in backwards compatibility through steam and other online game distributors.

  • hisao@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Currently 100% of my time is spent on games that are “six or more years old”, and a lot of that is spent on games that are more than 30 years old. But! I’m playing newly-made community content for 30 y/o games. This kind of retrogaming is something that evades Steam statistics entirely because it usually means playing custom sourceports of old games which rarely are on Steam. One old game I play on Steam to contribute to this statistics is Skyrim.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For me, definitely older and indie (old and new). I don’t get a lot of time these days to sit at my PC. Using my steam deck primarily these days is part of the reason I’m playing older games, but seriously I have a problem with steam/gog/name a storefront/ backlogs. I have so many games already, great time to review what I bought because of hype but never played.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah that whole conundrum, if you have the money to buy new games you don’t have the time to play them, if you had the time, you wouldn’t have the money to buy them.