• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What shits me is Christians (and Jews and Muslims, but it’s mainly Christians who do this) who just handwave away the problem of evil. Like fine, I can accept that some evils might arise as a result of human decisions and free will. Things like wars and genocides are done by people. It’s difficult to swallow even that much with the idea of a god who supposedly knows all, is capable of doing anything, and is “all good”, but fine, maybe free will ultimately supplants all that.

    But what I absolutely cannot accept is any claim that tries to square the idea of a god with the triple-omnis with the fact that natural disasters happen. That children die of cancer. You try telling the parents of a child slowly dying of a painful incurable disease that someone could fix it if they wanted, and they completely know about it, but that they won’t. And then try telling them that person is “all good”. See how they react.

    I find religious people who believe in the three omnis after having given it any amount of serious consideration to be absolutely disgusting and immoral people.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep years ago I was in a bible study, well on my way to being an agnostic already. They were going over a difficult passage and the conclusion was ‘god works in mysterious ways’. Not that I hadn’t heard that nonsense before but for some reason hearing it in that scenario was the last straw and I never went back.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, the average person gets a pass on this sort of thing because I generally assume they haven’t thought much about it. But it’s particularly galling when biblical scholars do it.

        I saw one biblical scholar whose schtick was debunking things evangelicals believe about the bible. He would happily admit it’s written by a collection of authors over a long period of time, who were doing so not literally but in rhetorical styles popular in their day. Things like that.

        Once, I saw him describe how the early Israelites did not believe in the three omnis. They may not have even believed in a monotheistic god, but it was certainly not omniscient and omnibenevolent. Then he went on to say that despite that—despite the fact that the authors of the religious text and the society that invented this god not believing in three omnis—he nevertheless did believe god was omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent. Wtf?

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but thought I’d provide a counter argument.

      A group of children are dying of a horrible, deadly disease that can only be cured with the bark from a specific tree. So we go into the forest and chop this tree down to save the children from an excruciating disease.

      A squirrel had built its entire home in that tree. That tree was everything to the squirrel. Now the squirrel has nothing and will suffer because we chopped down its home.

      How do we explain this to the squirrel? Well, we can’t. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain why we needed to destroy its home. The squirrel is physically incapable of understanding.

      Playing devils advocate here, perhaps the reason for the need for human suffering is so beyond our understanding and comprehension that we are just physically incapable of understanding. Maybe we’re just squirrels, and human suffering needs to happen for some greater purpose unbeknownst to us.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        We’re talking about the Abrahamic trio, so God is supposed to be all powerful. That means there is nothing beyond his power. There is no “can only” or “can’t” or “incapable” for him. He can have His cure and save the tree too, He doesn’t have to choose. Your example only works if God is limited in some capacity, and has to make trade offs that we can’t understand.

        • Maeve@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          A parent can easily do their children’s homework. How does that benefit the kids? A passing mark doesn’t mean the kid understands and the lessons don’t get easier.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The “homework” you’re talking about is war, starvation, disease, rape, slavery, and death.

            A parent is supposed to help their children, not torture them to death for a “lesson”.

            • Maeve@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              We did that. It’s our mess to clean up.

              Oh, but I never voted for that politician! Did we do anything besides vote and clicktivism?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Disease? Starvation? Disaster? Let us not pretend like God didn’t create human evil either. For what? For fun? “To teach us a lesson”?

                The all powerful, all knowing God never seems to do anything either in case you haven’t noticed.

                • Maeve@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  So we’re given the means to solve these tests. When we learn to work together to solve them, rather than “punishing” each other, we get closer to solving them. Disasters happen, whether natural or man-made. We either work together or we don’t. Test time.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    We aren’t given the means to solve every “test” - sometimes people just die in twisted agony because the test is impossible.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any “evil” suffered in current life will be compensated with reward in afterlife.

      The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That doesn’t work. People with crap lives often can’t meet the standards of goodness that many forms of Christianity need for you to be qualified for heaven

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If there is no evil how can there be good?

          If the purpose of life is to be a test, how can you test without challenges (evil)?

          The crux of the problem is once again the modernized version of Christianity. Where hell has been written out and Adolf Hitler goes to heaven because “Jesus died for his sins”.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            If there is no evil how can there be good?

            Easy. You take the world as it is right now…and then remove the evil things. Evil is a metaphysical concept. We often use analogies of light and dark, but it doesn’t literally work that way.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                First, you’ll note that I started this conversation by conceding free will and concentrating my discussion of evil on evils that are not performed by humans, but by the planet itself, or by fundamental biology.

                But as for “the concept of life as a test”…why is something supposedly omniscient performing a test? It should already know the result of said test, thus making the test itself irrelevant. That’s what omniscience is.

                • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Evil existing is necessary for a test in good and evil. Whether done by humans or natural causes.

                  Angels were created as perfect servants who obey all commands without free will. Humans were created as the opposite. Those who have free will to perform both good and evil.

                  It should already know the result of said test, thus making the test itself irrelevant. That’s what omniscience is.

                  An all-powerful entity is not bound by paradoxes. If that was the case it would end at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox which is even more extreme than the free-will paradox for which some explanations can be thought of.

      • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

        Huh? From what I can tell Christians are more fixated on hell than ever now. Listen to them talk about gay/trans people, Palestinians, women who get abortions, or literally anyone who isn’t Christian, and it’s clear that they’re really excited about the idea that their god will torture those people for all eternity while they get to watch from heaven. You’ll even get catholics and protestants both thinking they’re the only ones going to heaven and the “wrong” kind of Christian goes to hell because of technicalities like whether you go to confession or not or whether praying to Mary is idolatry. Some outright say that it’s okay to kill gay/trans people, Palestinians, etc, because they’re damned anyway and god doesn’t give a shit about them.